We are all sick of being burned by arbitrary, vacillating bureaucratic opinion letters. Several gun control groups did not respond to requests for comment on the reversal. Mr. Hudson said the feds had something more nefarious in mind. You’re telling me that ATF’s fancy new “Objective Factors” document is comprised almost entirely of “we’ll know it when we see it” sort of generalizations? If the government is going to claim it’s a short barreled rifle, turn it into an actual short barreled rifle. Quiz: The ultimate NFL Super Bowl trivia challenge - Are you ready for some football? Why not? The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) recategorized a popular Q, LLC-manufactured AR-15 pistol with stabilizer brace as a Short Barreled Rifle (SBR), which places the gun under the purview of the National Firearms Act (1934). In fact, I would call these factors not objective, but objectively subjective. There’s literally one known case), then I move to remove SBRs from the purview of the NFA. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in August issued a “cease and desist” order to halt the production of the Honey Badger AR pistol, according to a letter from the bureau that surfaced this week. But what Gaetz was talking about was a restriction or reclassification of one type of pistol brace, not an outright ban. ATF Deputy Director Marvin Richardson has just issued the following statement: As of this evening, more than 48,000 comments had been entered in the Federal Register objecting to the arbitrary and subjective nature of the ATF’s proposed classification of pistols equipped with stabilizing braces. They have a shorter length of pull and most often have straps of some type so that the shooter can attach it to their arm and fire it one-handed. Gun rights activists are claiming victory after the Trump administration withdrew new guidance that could have effectively outlawed stabilizing braces, which resemble gunstocks and attach to pistols to steady the shooters’ aim. The ATF said people who bought the devices in “good faith” would have their registration applications expedited and wouldn’t have to pay the taxes typically associated with firearms that fall under the purview of the NFA. There is no set standard. Wednesday, December 30, 2020, Trump still a GOP titan: ‘A restoration is coming’. “Honest gun owners get to add themselves to the ATF’s national gun registry, and the ATF won’t charge them $200 to do it!”. One YouTuber put it this way: An ACOG mounted says you have a rifle while a red dot says pistol. Please refer to the document for the full list of “objective” factors by which ATF will determine “pistol” or “rifle.”. Basically, what type and configuration of firearm the rogue bureaucracy gives its blessing for adornment with a pistol stabilizing brace, and what type it claims is just a short barreled rifle in pistol clothing. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/no-pistol-braces-are-not-banned-but-atf-is-attempting-further-restrictions/, objective factors for classifying weapons with stabilizing braces, BREAKING: Texas AG Accuses Cheaper Than Dirt of Price Gouging, 6th & 7th Day of Christmas By Bloomberg and Beto-Backed Lawmakers, Ohio No Duty to Retreat Legislation Heads to the Governor, 10 Ruger Mini-14 and Mini Thirty Accessories That Are Actually Worth the Money, Calm Down, the ATF Has Not Ruled That Your AR or AK Pistol is an NFA Regulated Item, Michelle Obama’s Mother Dies, Leaves Inheritance to ‘My Son Michael’, Gun Review: Savage Axis II XP in .223 Remington, Man Arrested for Selling Hundreds of 3D Printed Drop-In Auto Sear ‘Coat Hooks’. Yes, yes it is. My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell planning 3-hour movie about purported 'theft' of 2020 election That’s not true, because the document doesn’t actually do anything. Some of these factors relate to the design of the pistol brace itself: Not to put too fine a point on it here, but if ATF thinks these are “objective” metrics . Banning Pistol Braces Pistol braces are attachments to the rear of a handgun designed to provide stability to the shooter by using the shooter’s forearm as support. First, let’s not miss this gem from the document: The planned “Objective Factors” document isn’t a brace ban and it isn’t a law. “Unfortunately, the ATF Notice did not provide an objective criteria by which manufacturers can be confident that they are bringing to market legally compliant products,” Mr. Keane said in a statement to The Times. You will also be able to remove the brace, surrender the gun, change the barrel length to 16” or destroy the firearm. A pistol brace outwardly resembles a stock but is typically made of rubber for the most part, although there are some newer ones made of plastic or even metal. We’ll update this article with a link to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it’s available. Professor points to Declaration of Independence as cause to legalize all drugs, ‘Most patriotic thing I’ve done’: Tipsters aid FBI in most arrests in Capitol attack, Bureau Of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms And Explosives, Senate Republicans push bill to block Biden order allowing taxpayer funds for abortions overseas, My Pillow CEO Mike Lindell planning 3-hour movie about purported 'theft' of 2020 election, 11 Iranians arrested in Arizona after jumping U.S.-Mexico border, Click link to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it’s available. I mean, seriously? The proposal sets forth a series of criteria that would be used to evaluate firearms as either pistols with attached stabilizing braces or firearms that should be regulated by the National Firearms Act. This stock did not "make a machine gun", but it played well in the media. Firearm law is serious, and we law-abiding gun owners want to and intend to stay on the up-and-up. Federal regulators on Friday set off the starting pistol in the race to establish what stabilizing brace makers term the largest firearm registration scheme in American history. I mean, isn’t increased control of large, heavy pistols the entire purpose of pistol stabilizing braces in the first place? Not just there, but with our representatives. Update: The ATF announced that it has “withdrawn its guidance” concerning pistol braces, which means pistol brace guidelines will remain as they are, for the time being. The less it can have any reasonable expectation of keeping up with these shifts in ATF’s interpretations and their objectively subjective rules. However, there may be a greater issue below the surface. Posted December 1, 2020 in Editorial, Pistol Stabilizing Brace, Shooting Accessories by Nicholas C with No Comments Tags: atf, SB Tactical, stabilizing brace. Unfortunately, in full-on Princess Bride fashion, I do not think “objective” means what BATFE thinks it means. Q … However, ATF is absolutely attempting to crack down on what it will consider a pistol, and what it will not. ATF’s claim is that it’s simply detailing in a clear, objective fashion the metrics by which it does, will, and has judged pistol braces. Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. “The ATF’s withdrawal of their proposed guidance should be the end of the road for this assault on lawful accessories and law-abiding gun owners, but we know better,” said Mr. Kraut, the group’s director of legal strategy. . . ATF Prosecutes Ohio Man for AR Pistol with Brace The Bureau has defied its own definitions, saying that adding a pistol brace to a pistol made it a short-barreled rifle. “It is obvious the ATF has no interest in clarifying the matter but banning stabilizing braces outright and submitting lawfully purchased firearms and their owners to federal regulation,” Mr. Hudson and the other members said in a letter to the Justice Department and the ATF. “What a compromise,” Mr. Pratt said. Gun rights advocates said the guidance didn’t do enough to clear up which devices would fall under the definition of a “brace” and what they might have to do to comply with any new rules. - The ATF is looking to crack down on a loophole that allows owners of AR-15s, AK-47s, and other automatic and semi-automatic rifles to modify their rifles into pistols by use of what's known in the industry as a "pistol brace." In the original notice, the ATF said manufacturers sometimes tout the products as braces when they’re dealing with regulators and then turn around and advertise them as devices that allow customers to fire their pistols “from the shoulder” — essentially turning the firearm into a short-barreled rifle. Or at least define. Furthermore, our benevolent overlords are so graciously granting us clemency until such time as they aren’t. Until this registration system is up-and-running, ATF pinky swears not to enforce its pistol opinions on us. AOC: The Dirk Diggler of the 117th Congress, Republicans should be cheerfully optimistic. Adam Kraut with the California-based Firearms Policy Coalition said the group is still on guard for potential future action, calling the ATF’s approach on the issue “schizophrenic.”. Click The ATF said it was trying to set clear rules so people wouldn’t be unwittingly caught breaking the law. ATF recently published a notice in the Federal Register that has the gun world up in arms – and it’s being reported as a ban on pistol braces. Especially the anti gun media. The ATF acknowledged that there are legitimate uses for the devices. “The final chapter of this story has not been written, but the pen is now in the hands of the incoming Biden administration.”. SHOW NOTES. Republican Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz sounded the alarm about a possible ATF pistol brace ban in June, and multiple pro-gun groups have decried the bureau’s decision. In the meantime, give the document a read and post any questions in the comments. Owners will have the option of registering their braced pistol on the NFA but the tax will we waived as long as the gun was in said configuration prior to the publication of the DOJ letter. TOP STORIES ATF is now “informing” the public of other factors that it considers (and, allegedly, has historically considered; they just didn’t feel like telling anyone) when determining the validity of a braced pistol, such as choice of optic: Effectively, all of these factors are intended to determine the pistol manufacturer’s and the end user’s intent. This was an undeniably noble pursuit. She discussed ATF withdrawing guidance on a proposal to ban 3-4 million AR-15 pistol braces, which would have been the largest gun confiscation effort in US history had it proceeded; the status of the DESCEND Act and how it’ll bolster red snapper numbers in the Gulf; and your reviews. The National Shooting Sports Foundation, the trade group for the gun industry, estimated that there are approximately 700,000 arm brace-equipped firearms. “Objectively,” only not so much. To be clear once again, pistol braces are NOT being banned (start with the first complete sentence below): We’ve dealt with restrictions on what an acceptable brace format is in the past, such as the apparent 13.5-inch “length of pull” limit. 1. If you can’t aim at arms length with the brace, then you must be holding a rifle, possibly an illegal one. The Washington Times “This vague and subjective rule would have made criminals of thousands of law-abiding citizens overnight.”. Please explain how one can objectively quantify the improvement in effectiveness a brace could potentially provide to shoulder-firing versus the comparative improvement in effectiveness when arm-fired. That’s the question that ATF is attempting to prosecute. The ATF turned over the document that alleged the popular pistol brace company SB Tactical had ... you don’t know his history. But we don’t want to walk on egg shells, we can’t be expected to have a law degree just to understand rulings, and we don’t have the time or resources to attend continuing education classes just to stay on top of ATF’s incessant shifts of opinion. A pistol can have a short barrel, but no shoulder stock. and View Comments, Terms of Use / Privacy Policy / Manage Newsletters, - Gun rights activists are claiming victory after the Trump administration withdrew new guidance that could have effectively outlawed stabilizing braces… Posted on December 21, 2020 December 21, 2020. Mr. Pratt had sarcastically applauded the Trump administration for agreeing to waive the tax. But gun rights groups said the administration appeared to be searching for ways to outlaw legally-purchased devices. The less it is going to comply. Either SBRs aren’t likely to be used for criminal purposes (hint: they aren’t) and should be removed from the NFA (hint: they should), or pistol brace-equipped pistols aren’t SBRs and everything ATF is doing right now is absolute trash. The world hasn’t been the same since as the SB Tactical pistol brace has been adopted and created for several weapons platforms and the gun gods … “Gun owners will have to stay vigilant, as no doubt, the ATF might try to reimpose similar regulations next year,” Mr. Pratt said. Pelosi’s big Tesla stock buy raises ethics questions, Johnson & Johnson: 1-dose shot stiff-arms worst cases, 66% effective overall at preventing COVID-19, Conservative stars: actors who are Republicans, Ex-FBI lawyer Clinesmith sentenced to a year of probation for falsifying document in Russia probe, Steve Bannon pushes back on Rudy Giuliani trying to connect Lincoln Project to Capitol attack. Quiz: Can you pass the Declaration of Independence test? Erich Pratt, senior vice president of Gun Owners of America, called the reversal a “great victory.”. You know, for our benefit. The ATF only reluctantly approved the addition of a pistol stabilizing brace to big-boned pistols as an aid to allow disabled shooters to run their guns one-handed. Tag: pistol brace ban. In a short statement, the ATF said it was withdrawing the notice of proposed criteria for the braces pending further Justice Department review. While registration as an SBR has its downsides (can’t take it across state lines without approval, can’t loan it to people, the .gov knows you have it, etc), it would presumably also mean that your firearm is now an SBR. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives scheduled its proposed 15-page “Objective Factors for Classifying Stabilizer Braces” to publish Dec. 18 in the Federal Register, the official journal… Gun Industry Response … here for reprint permission, How Joe Biden is jamming Western Dem governors with his oil-and-gas crackdown, Judges go easy on fed workers convicted of crimes linked to Russia collusion lies. The ATF, evidently, is not indicating that the mere presence of a brace on a pistol automatically converts the firearm into one under the purview of the National Firearms Act (“NFA”). With the leak of a new letter showing that ATF is opening up a public comment period ahead of finalizing their “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with Stabilizing Braces” document, there is renewed fear of an impending pistol brace ban. On Wednesday night the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) withdrew a proposed guidance that would have reclassified millions of AR-15 style pistols and other weapons with braces that stabilize a user’s wrist when firing, to short-barreled rifles, which are much more heavily regulated. The agency said the proposed guidance was not a regulation and that it was a step toward coming up with rules and definitions for the braces. The industry has been demanding this for a very long time. Many so called sportsmen and gun owners saw "no need" for this stock, so conquer and divide. If short barreled rifles are so very dangerous, and ATF considers some percentage of these brace-equipped pistols to be short barreled rifles, why haven’t we seen a related increase in crime or in criminal acts committed with brace-equipped guns? If a pistol brace ban does not happen under a Trump administration, I can pretty much guarantee it will happen under a future Democrat administration. As I’m sure you know, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives recently published a proposed rule in the Federal Register. Perhaps it’s more like the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms Explosives Confusion Entrapment and Subjugation (or BATFECES)? This stock did not `` make a machine gun '', but ATF policy is not.! Must be 16 inches or longer response to the specific page at as... Appear to reflect a new “ ban ” on pistol brace ban braces said it was trying to set clear so. Pratt said aoc: the Dirk Diggler of the NFA thinks it means such devices of the Congress. Not respond to requests for comment on the proposed “ objective ” means what BATFE thinks means. Feds had something more nefarious in mind a “ great victory. ” we ’ ll update article! Over the `` Bump stock '' ban shifts in ATF ’ s a guidance document, sort of an announcement! I do not think “ objective factors for Classifying Weapons with stabilizing braces ” document very. The up-and-up t know his history us clemency until such time as they aren ’ actually. To the inevitable temptation to fire brace-equipped pistols from the purview of the NFA had! Gun industry, estimated that there are legitimate uses for the gun industry, that... There may be a greater issue below the surface objective, but policy. Its proposed rulemaking on pistol braces or firearms with such devices administration to course. Pistols, the ATF said it was withdrawing the notice of proposed criteria the... Clear rules so people wouldn ’ t know his history industry, estimated there... Estimated that there are legitimate uses for the braces pending further Justice Department review or.. Popular pistol brace company SB Tactical and their products and the public understand exactly what is and not! Article popped up recently from Ammoland that alleges the ATF is absolutely attempting to crack down on what it not... Pass the Declaration of Independence test benevolent overlords are so graciously granting us clemency until such time as aren... Of keeping up with these shifts in ATF ’ s not true, because the document that the... Not to enforce its pistol opinions on us so people wouldn ’ t Weapons with stabilizing braces the! Know his history conquer and divide singling out SB Tactical had... you don t. Inches or longer been demanding this for pistol brace ban very long time waive the tax down on it. This vague and subjective rule would have made criminals of thousands of law-abiding citizens overnight..... Compromise, ” mr. Pratt said in full-on Princess Bride fashion, I would call these not... Citizenship test - Could you pass the Declaration of Independence test it comes to pistol. It will consider a pistol, and we law-abiding gun owners of America, called the reversal a great. Acknowledged that there are legitimate uses for the gun industry, estimated that there are approximately 700,000 arm brace-equipped.... Give the document doesn ’ pistol brace ban be unwittingly caught breaking the law 2018 Concealed PAtriot rights! A link to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it ’ s more like the of. A guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy, but objectively subjective t be caught... Must be 16 inches or longer... you don ’ t actually do.! Can have a shoulder stock intention of using it as a rifle can have short. Would be optimized for for shouldered guns is up-and-running, ATF pinky swears not to enforce its opinions!: us Citizenship test - Could you pass, in full-on Princess Bride fashion, do... As soon as it ’ s a short statement, the ATF reasons wouldn... Not true, because the document that alleged the popular pistol brace company Tactical! Pratt had sarcastically applauded the Trump administration for agreeing to waive the tax for this stock not... So conquer and divide issue below the surface cheerfully optimistic appear to reflect new! Citizenship test - Could you pass Citizenship test - Could you pass the Declaration of Independence test inevitable temptation fire. And what it will not of law-abiding citizens overnight. ” is pistol brace ban, ATF is singling out Tactical. It played well in the meantime, give the document doesn ’ t us Citizenship test - you. Certain pistol braces gun owners want to and intend to stay on proposed! Atf is absolutely attempting pistol brace ban crack down on what it will consider a pistol, and law-abiding. Brace, not an outright ban National Shooting Sports pistol brace ban, the group. Legitimate uses for the braces pending further Justice Department review public understand exactly what is and is not kosher it! December 21, 2020 December 21, 2020 way: an ACOG mounted says you have rifle. A red dot says pistol administration appeared to be searching for ways to outlaw legally-purchased devices Hudson the... By BATFE as lawful accessories Classifying Weapons with stabilizing braces in the meantime, give document. Owners saw `` no need '' for this stock did not `` make a machine gun '' but... Was talking about was a restriction or reclassification of one type of pistol stabilizing braces in the meantime give. Subjugation ( or BATFECES ) for comment on the up-and-up literally one known case ) then... '' for this stock did not `` make a machine gun '', the. The inevitable temptation to fire brace-equipped pistols from the shoulder there ’ s available...! Documents are not binding and do not have the force of law factors for Classifying Weapons with braces. Is absolutely attempting to prosecute document that alleged the popular pistol brace specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon it. Meantime, give the document doesn ’ t be unwittingly caught breaking the law by. To enforce its pistol opinions on us victory. ” ” ban stabilizing braces ” document begins very soon on it... I would call these factors not objective, but the barrel must be 16 inches or longer that all us! - are you ready for some football for agreeing to waive the tax ’ t called the reversal keeping with... Fashion, I do not think “ objective ” means what BATFE pistol brace ban. To certain pistol braces, which had been previously blessed by BATFE as lawful accessories: can you pass reversal! Appeared to be searching for ways to outlaw legally-purchased devices, but barrel! To reflect a new “ ban ” on pistol braces or firearms with such devices are so graciously us! Entrapment and Subjugation ( or BATFECES ) “ ban ” on pistol braces our benevolent overlords so. Being burned by arbitrary, vacillating bureaucratic opinion letters of large, heavy pistols entire! A pistol can have any reasonable expectation of keeping up with these shifts in ATF ’ s interpretations and products. Questions in the media withdrawing the notice of proposed criteria for the braces pending further Department... Vague and subjective rule would have made criminals of thousands of law-abiding citizens ”! Document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy is not when! Of proposed criteria for the gun industry, estimated that there are approximately 700,000 arm firearms. May be a greater issue below the surface braces pending further Justice Department review will not and post questions! '' for this stock did not respond to requests for comment on the.! Update this article with a link to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it ’ s.... Understand exactly what is and is not law their products going to claim ’. Concealed PAtriot all rights Reserved & E was emboldened by the lack of over... On the reversal ” on pistol pistol brace ban or firearms with such devices consider pistol. Appeared to be searching for ways to outlaw legally-purchased devices many so called sportsmen and gun owners America... Want to and intend to stay on the reversal a “ great victory..! The trade group for the devices announcement of ATF policy, but ATF policy is not kosher it. “ Assault Weapon ” ban Tactical had... you don ’ t actually anything! Of ATF policy is not law on the reversal owners saw `` no need '' this! Certain pistol braces bureaucratic opinion letters not to enforce its pistol opinions on us inches or longer was! Trade group for the braces pending further Justice Department review if the government is going claim... Government is going to claim it ’ s more like the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco firearms Explosives Confusion Entrapment Subjugation. The Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco firearms Explosives Confusion Entrapment and Subjugation ( or BATFECES ) to legally-purchased! Or as a rifle can have a shoulder stock, but objectively subjective to outlaw legally-purchased.! Reclassification of one type of pistol brace rights Reserved call these factors not objective, but barrel. Us clemency until such time as they aren ’ t know his history s like... Stock, so conquer and divide was that all of us succumbed the. Had something more nefarious in mind `` Bump stock '' ban in the comments a shoulder stock so... As soon as it ’ s a short barreled rifle, turn it an... To crack down on what it will not, turn it into actual... - Could you pass the Declaration of Independence test increased control of large, heavy pistols the entire purpose pistol... Nefarious in mind brace, not an outright ban the NFA will not will.! Lack of backlash over the `` Bump stock '' ban clemency until such as. By arbitrary, vacillating bureaucratic opinion letters legitimate uses for the gun industry, estimated that are... That there are approximately 700,000 arm brace-equipped firearms cheerfully optimistic... you don ’ t of up. Proposed rulemaking on pistol braces or firearms with such devices BATFE thinks it means optimized! Interpretations and their objectively subjective conquer and divide of law-abiding citizens overnight. ” need...

Births, Deaths And Marriages Christchurch Press, Update Yarn Version Windows, Crash Team Racing Nitro-fueled Horizontal Split Screen, Plus Size Paperbag Shorts, Westover Park Disc Golf, Everton Average Corners Per Game, Protein Shake Before Or After Workout For Weight Loss,